The Rise of the Actor to National Stardom: The Qing Court's Management of Peking Opera and the Shanghai Challenge (1870-1912)

Catherine V. Yeh

Paper presented for the conference on: "Urban Cultural Institutions in

Early Twentieth Century China" (April 12-13, 2002; Version April 11, 2002)

 

Introduction: The Yang Yuelou case and the issue of star culture

 

      On December 23, 1873 (Tongzhi 12) the newly founded Chinese language newspaper the Shenbao reported a case relating to a Peking opera singer Yang Yuelou ·¨¤ë¼Ó who was engaged at the Dangui theater ¤¦®Û¯ù¶é   as invited lead singer with the title of kechuan «È¦ê.[1] The case involved the marriage of the opera singer to the daughter of a well-to-do merchant from Xiangshan district in Guangdong. The main objection by the Xiangshan people was that Yang as an opera singer was forbidden by social convention if not by law to enter into such a marriage; being the lowest caste in society, they were to marry only within their own ranks.[2] On orders of the District Magistrate, Yang was severely flogged and was given a heavy sentence that was only commuted in 1875.[3] The case created a considerable stir in Shanghai. With the Shenbao as a nationally distributed paper and one of the very few Chinese language papers read by a whole range of readers in the Qing empire, the flood of letters and editorials it published on the matter  made the case and Yang Yuelou’s name into information shared on a national scale.[4]

      That such a case was deemed worthy of a long and heated public debate highlights some of the predicaments facing a society in a time of radical transformation. Of interest for the topic I will deal with is the fact that it reflects on the social position of actors at the time, and involved a particular business practice and theater organization of the Shanghai International Settlement, namely the system of the invited guest singers. Yang Yuelou had been invited from Peking to Shanghai in the early1870s by Liu Weizhong ¼B ºû ¾ , the owner of the Dangui chayuan  theater, to be his lead singer.[5] Such "guest singers" were regarded by Shanghai audiences as an integral part of theater performances, and these singer were identified and advertised by their own individual name rather than as a member of an opera troupe, as was the custom in Peking. The social standing as well as the financial rewards of these guest singers were on an altogether different scale as the regular members of the Shanghai troupe they happened to be performing with.

      The event furthermore points to the new role of the Shanghai press. As one of the earliest Chinese-language newspapers, the Shenbao set the example of making theater matters part of its daily reporting. In the Yang Yuelou's case, the Shenbao went beyond reporting, translating from the Western papers, and editorializing, but opened its pages  for a public debate on the case and its handling by the Ye Tingjuan, the District Magistrate who himself happened to be from Xiangshan. No no such kind of publication forum existed in Peking.

      Finally, one of the stated reasons for the harsh treatment of both Yang Yuelou and the young woman was Ye’s intention to put a stop to women joining the theater audience. The presence of women in the theaters of the International Settlement was in striking contrast to the practice in cities such as Peking where this was strictly prohibited. At stake in the case were thus public morals and social order. That a famous actor could fan up such a crave in a young woman to induce her to willingly risk the name and social standing of her family seemed to call for the magistrate’s intervention.

      All these aspects of the Yang Yuelou case bring into focus that the foreign concessions with their unique institutional and legal environment created a leeway in Chinese society to loosen long-held social prejudices and to flout prohibitions and class distinctions, and a public format to discuss such matters. The fact that the case went to court instead of being settled by applying to the actors' gild, such as as the Jing zhong hui ºë ¾ ·|  in Peking where traditionally cases involving an actor had been dealt with,  underlines the uniqueness of the Shanghai situation.

      These three related elements of the Yang Yuelou case serve to define the conditions and the particular features of the rise of the actor to modern stardom and the formation of a star culture in its initial phase. "Stars" in entertainment, persons patronized by local elites or even the Emperor himself, were not new in China. But up to the late nineteenth century, the fame of these individuals was circumscribed by region or social segment. The emergence of entertainers as national stars transcending regional and class lines only began in the late Qing. It was bound up with the development of a new way of organizing theater productions which promoted the individual, rather than an entire troupe; with new financial arrangements between the individual, the owner of an opera troupe, and the theater; and most importantly with the introduction of new cultural forms such as the nationally distributed newspapers, together with the adoption of new technologies such as photography and later, film. The rise of the star culture as a national phenomenon was based on these new structures, media, and technologies.

The rise of the actor to national star put Shanghai in direct competition with Peking. Peking opera enjoyed continuous patronage from the Qing court which had been instrumental in its development. This was still true in the late nineteenth century with the pivotal role played by the Empress Dowager Cixi (1835-1908). The historical record is quite clear that from the mid-1880s to her death in 1908, Cixi was largely responsible for the revival of opera performances as part of the regular activities of the court, and this included patronizing opera troupes as well as individual actors. The question in this paper is not so much which center -- Shanghai or Peking --  played a more important role in the rise of the star culture, but where the shift in terms of institutional change took place that regardless of personal taste, paved the way for this development?

      I will map the rise of the star and star culture by looking, first, at the theater as a business enterprise, in particular how with the development of a new and  different type of theater business structure, Shanghai offered a radically different approache to patronage and marketing compared to that of Peking, thus laying the institutional foundation for the emergence of the star (in a similar way in which Hollywood’s studio system transformed the film industry in the 1930s);[6] second, at the Shanghai factor reflected in the policy changes of the Office of court entertainment -- Shengping shu ª@ \­ ¸p -- during period when the Empress Dowager controlled the court; and third, at the mass media as the main engine spreading and promoting the culture surrounding the star, in particular, the all-important commercial aspects of image building and advertisement.

 

 

The business side of opera: Troupe, theater and finance

 

It is a well-established historical fact that Peking opera was born in the city of Peking when troupes from Anhui province representing it earlier style came to the city to perform during the celebrations of the Qianlong emperor’s birthday in 1790. This emperor had a passion for the stage and most of the theater venues in Imperial Palace were built during his reign. The laws and rituals governing theater and theater troupes developed during the following century; at times emperors, motivated by the question of public morals or the public perception of austerity at court, would resort to extreme measures to control the new fad. During the Jiaqing (1796-1821) and Daoguang (1821-1851) reigns it was prohibited to invite outside actors to perform in court. And in 1799, the Jiaqing Emperor made it a law that all opera troupes were banned within the city walls. During the Tongzhi reign (1862-1875) even a lover of theater such as Cixi did not dare to openly break these long-standing court rules. Only since her rise to power during 1880s, she was able to alter these measures.

Thus Peking opera troupes after a high point of enjoying the Qianlong Emperor's patronage, had to resign themselves to provide an entertainment very popular among urban dwellers. The troupes settled outside of the city gate Zhengyang men (Qianmen),[7] and during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries commercial theaters sprang up in and around this area.[8] [Fig. 1] 

      The institutional structure of the best-known troupes in the capital was as follows: There is the head (banzhu ¯Z \D ) of the troupe; he is normally a well-establish actor himself who commands a great deal of professional respect. The troupe consists of outstanding actors for all major roles (sheng --male hero, dan --female impersonator, jing ²b  -- painted face, and chou ¤¡ -- the clown), with a cast of supporting actors and musicians. An actor can join the troupe by invitation from the troupe's head, or apply for admittance. In either case, the financial conditions are the same. Before the late nineteenth century, there is no clear hierarchy among the top actors in a given troupe. The troupe is conceived more as an artistic unit with an emphasis on its ability to offer a wide range of programs. Being the chief meant shouldering the primary responsibility for the survival of the troupe. The troupe was not really regarded as a business enterprise that could be bought and sold. This fact can be seen in the numerous examples of a troupe being handed to someone on the merits not of his being the heir of the previous owner, but based solely on the ability to lead and manage without any payment being made for this transfer.

      The relationship between the actor and the troupe was contractual. Contracts were normally set up on an annual basis. After agreeing on the financial terms, the actor would sign a contract with the troupe, called baoyin \] »È . The contract would specify that the actor would receive  a part of the money at the beginning of every quarter during the period of the contract. His own obligation was not only to show up for work and perform to the best of his abilities, but he was also strictly forbidden, during the period of the contract, to participate in performances of other troupes or perform privately. This rule was hard to enforce, and therefore the punishment for breach of contract was extremely harsh: he would be kicked out of the profession by the actor's guild Jinghui hui. Sometimes a very popular actor could have his baoyin paid in half or in full when the contract was signed. For transportation to venues, an actor would receive an extra sum equal to about 10% of the baoyin. The financial responsibility remained fully that of the head of the troupe.[9]

It is hard to make a general assessment of the amount paid to the actors. The range given for actors between the 1820s and the 1880s was from several hundred liang for the top singers to 20 or 30 liang or less for the lower ranks.[10] The earnings of those who were considered "super stars" of their days, such as the "li yuan sanjie" ±ù ¶é ¤Tµ´ , marked the high end: Cheng Changgeng µ{ ªø °  (1811-1879), head to the famous Sanqing troupe ¤T¼y¯Z  received 660 diao per annum for his baoyin (equivalent to $478 silver dollars in Republican terms); Xiu Xiaoxiang ®} ¤p ­»  (1831-?), and He Guishan ¦ó ®Û ¤s (1841-?) who were both members of this Sanqing troupe, received during the 1860s and 70s 440 diao (about $318 silver dollars). The price for a ticket in those days was one diao (10 copper coins in the Republican terms); different seats did not carry different prices.[11]

      In Peking, opera troupe and theater were two different business enterprises who would enter into a contractual relationship. An opera troupe maintained itself by performing in commercial theaters, at private parties, on public festivals and now and then at the court. Records show that from the middle of the nineteenth century, commercial theaters were signing contracts with different troupes in the capital so that each month they had set days for the performance of a certain troupe. A troupe would during the years sign contracts with different theaters in the city and would circulate among them. During the nineteenth century there were about eight main troupes actively involved in performing in some nine major theaters.[12] In this system the troupes were rotating through different locations throughout the year.[13] Financially, troupe and theater remained independent during the early period. The troupe paid a set fee to the theater and any financial loss and gain concerned only the troupe. By the end of the nineteenth century we find new financial arrangement with a shared risk (refereed to at the time as bizhang ¼A ±b ): rent was reduced, and the two parties would share the box office receipts. Later in the Republican area, things evolved back again into a purely rental arrangement. [14] The theater thus was a pure business institution, it had no direct dealings with individual actors and its only concern was to rent out a locale to opera troupes to perform in.

      Up to the last decade of the nineteenth century, this was by and large the arrangement between actor and troupe, troupe and theater. The troupe’s emphasis was on the collective and a collective identity, and the theater’s on a purely financial deal.

      From the time when Peking opera first came to be performed in the Shanghai Foreign Settlements, business arrangements followed a very different path.

     

 

A new form of theater organization: the measure of star power at the market place

      The fact that Peking and Shanghai had two radically different system of theater organization is well established. While in Peking opera troupe and theater were two different business enterprises, since the introduction of Peking opera in the Foreign Settlements during the 1860s these two institutions were organized here as one.

Prior to the founding of the Shanghai Foreign Settlements the theater scene in the old Shanghai walled city was very typical of other such small towns in the region with troupes from Suzhou featuring Kunqu opera coming to perform. All these troupes fell apart during the Taiping War. After the war one or two theaters were built in the walled city, but they did not last long. From this period on almost all of the theaters were built in the Foreign Settlements. During the 1860s, the theater Mantingfang º¡®xªÚ was founded by Luo Yiqing ù¶h­ë, a British subject, who was in the gambling business until it became illegal. The theater established two new features for Shanghai theater entertainment. Well connected, Luo built a theater modeled on the Peking style and as there were no Peking opera troupe around, he sent his people to Tianjin to hire one and to purchase the necessary Peking opera costumes and stage props. According to one source, this troupe consisted entirely of women performing bangzi ±õ ¤l -- a Northern style of local opera.[15] The theater was built on Baoshan Road Ä_µ½µó  in the English concession (then already part of the International Settlement) in 1866 and opened for business in 1867. It was the first time Peking opera was performed in Shanghai with actors invited from the North. It was at first a great success.[16] Unfortunately this only lasted one year since competition appeared as soon as it opened.

Competition came from the Dangui chayuan ¤¦®Û¯ù¶é which  opened in the same year and along the same idea. The owner Liu Weizhong ¼Bºû¾  had fled north during the Taiping War and found shelter with the Sanqing troupe in Peking where he made friends with Cheng Changgeng.[17] In the process, he gained an intimate knowledge of the stage. When he returned to Shanghai in the 1860s, he opened the Dangui chayuan which was to become a landmark in the history of Shanghai theater. He had it built by carpenters whom he sent to Peking to learn the style; it had two floors and he divided the second floor into private boxes separated by  walls, a feature that did not exist in the Peking theaters. Costumes and props were specially ordered and custom-made in Canton. For singers, Liu personally journeyed to Peking to elicit help from his old friends in the business. He was thus able to present to the Shanghai audience a cast of able singers from Peking. Some of these singers remained with Dangui and became permanent members in the troupe. Liu continued to seek out well-known or promising young singers from Peking for short term appearances. Some years later Liu had financial troubles; after the trial of Yang Yuelou when Liu tried all he could to help the guest-star he had invited to Shanghai, his resources were depleted and he sold the Dangui. The theater, however, remained in operation for the next thirty years.[18]

Financial management of theaters in Shanghai greatly differed from that in Peking. The major expenditure was the sum the theater owner paid the visiting actor. In the 1860s and 1870s when Yang Yuelou was first invited to sing at the Dangui, he was paid more than $1,200 silver dollars per year.[19] Zhou Fenglin P »ñ ªL was paid $ 2,000, and Wang Guifen ¨L ®Û ªâ $ 3,000. When Sun Juxian »^ µâ \P  came to Shanghai in the early 1870s, he suggested to the owner of the theater that instead of receiving a lump sum they should share the profit; this got him $2,000 a month![20] Tan Xinpei ÃÓøÊ°ö raised the sum to new highs: in 1901 he received $2,000 for one month’s performance, by 1912 he reached  $15,000, and in his last visit in 1915 he received $8,000 for a ten days visit. At the same time the theater grossed in these ten days 30,000.[21] There are also accounts which claim that by the end, Tan's fees reached $24,000.[22] There is the well known story that when Mei Lanfeng was first invited to perform in Shanghai, as a fairly unknown actor, he was offers $1,800 for a one month engagement, while Wang Fengqing, the leading dan actor at the time, was offered $3,200; this was of course the famous visit which put Mei on the road to stardom.[23] From these numbers it is clear that the Shanghai theater paid vast sums for visiting actors from Peking, sums that easily exceeded the yearly income in Peking. For the basic troupe member, however, Shanghai kept to the traditional baoyin system, and this lasted well into the Republic area when Peking had already changed its system. The sum these actors received in Shanghai was likely to be the equivalent to that made by the Peking actors at the time, or slightly higher.

      With the Mantingfang, and especially with Dangui theater, Shanghai constructed a  unique theater system which differed from the rest of the Empire. (1) The unit of the business is the theater i.e. the building plus a permanent troupe owned by the theater owner as part of the business. Like a business company, theater often founded on investors money. This structure gave the owner more control and flexibility, and allowed him to be directly in touch with his market, satisfying the changing tastes and demands of the audience with ever new novelty and attraction. It allowed for competition between different theaters rather than different schools and styles. To establish a theater as a business enterprise, furthermore, was considerably simpler in Shanghai than in Peking. All one needed to do was to register with the Municipal Council and pay taxes each year.[24] By contrast, to establish a new troupe in Peking one has to first gain the support and agreement from the Jingzhong hui, the semi- official  theater guild that worked in conjunction with the court’s Shengping office, a topic which we will come back to. The Shanghai theaters with their troupes were owned largely not by lead singers as in Peking but by businessmen and investors who saw the enterprise mainly as profitable investment. It was in fact an excellent business opportunity, and many Peking Opera stars such as Sun Juxian, Huang Yueshan ¶À¤ë¤s and Li Chunlai §õ¬K¨Ó eventually seized upon it by opening their own theater businesses. Shanghai did not produce its own lead actors, it imported them and made them into stars.

From the very beginning, the Shanghai theater was founded on a "star system" that combined the permanent local basic troupe, bandi ¯Z³, with lead singers,  jiaoer ¨¤¨à, hired from Peking on short-term contracts. The importing of talents thus became an intrigal part of its operation. The business strategy of the Shanghai theater owner was not to buy talent for keeps but for their value as “sensation.” This necessarily involved creating a high profile through intense publicity. This new system of running the business of the theater brought about the term kechuan marking the ‘guest star’ as an integral part of Shanghai Peking opera performance.[25] Since the 1870s, this term began to be used to announce the arrival of short-term visiting lead singers such as  Sun Juxian and Yang Yuelou; it appeared on advertisements posted at the main gates of the theaters and also on the pillars of the stage.[26] [Fig. 2] With the aim to continuously offer something new to the Shanghai audience, and to make it worthwhile for the lead  singers to come, a combination of extremely high monetary rewards for the singing and intense publicity became the insignia of the star; part of his fame was made by the public rumors of what fortune it took to bring him here.

      The "star system" arose from the Shanghai theater business practices since the 1860s. Individual singers were singled out as potential stars marked by the power to make their art translate into profit at the market place. Once one of them arrived in Shanghai he was known not in connection to the troupe to which he belonged, but as a individual representing one of the highlights in the Shanghai theater season with his name resounding throughout the city through the media and advertisement, and from here making it into minds and mouths throughout the country. The system created a cult of the individual both as a artist with the power to move and excite and as an icon associated with glamour, fashion, decadence, and, needless to say, Shanghai success.

 

Power and patronage: The Shengping shu ¤É\­¸p and the wishes of the “Number one lady”

 

      "The Empress Dowager Cixi spent a very busy and exciting year in 1883," states Yao Shuyi in her article on Peking opera and the court during the late Qing period.[27] After  the radical reforms of 1827 by the Daoguang emperor which saw the complete ban of actors from outside the court, a drastic reduction of actors within the court, and an overhaul of the organization of the office which managed the court’s opera entertainment, Cixi eventually found the power to undo them. In March 1883, she lifted the ban restricting the court from bringing in actors from outside and gave orders to start asking  individual actors from outside to come and perform in court. She began to plan the creation of a private opera troupe under her own directorship.[28] On June 12th, one day after the official mourning period for Empress Dowager Cian ended, Cixi openly enjoyed herself by indulging in a ten hour opera performance! On October 10, she celebrated her 49th birthday, and for this occasion ordered performances on Oct. 2, and again on Oct. 9th which included 17 programs. A year later, when she turned 50, in a twenty-one day celebration  from October 1 to the 20th no less than sixteen days were devoted to theater performances. To prepare for this event, the Shengping shu in 1883 selected 20 actors to join the court under the title of "Attendants of the inner court" (gongfeng neiting ¨Ñ ^ ¤º §Ê ). From then on such selection became routine in the daily tasks of this office. Thus after the great but long-gone days of court sponsorship for the opera under the Qianlong Emperor, it was Cixi who revived this legacy once again. With the death of her husband Emperor Xianfeng in 1874, the new Tongzhi Emperor being just a small boy, and the death of Empress Dowager Cian, by 1883 Cixi came to gain absolute political power, and she brought about the second high point of theatrical life in the Qing court.

      The decision to once again invite outside actors for performances in the court had the most profound effect on the development of Peking opera. It was by far the most controversial decision to be made by Cixi, since the imperial decree by the Daoguang Emperor had been quite explicit that the decision of evict outside actors from the court was never to be rescinded.[29] Cixi had to find a way around this, and the question was with what pretext to bring back the outside singers? (In fact they had already been temporarily reinstalled by the Xianfeng emperor between 1860 to 1863). From the time of Daoguang, theatrical performances in court had been performed by court performers selected from the eunuchs and bannermen under the office of the Shengping shu. Acting as a middleman and power broker, this office now established the link between the court and the theater world outside. To satisfy Cixi’s wish to see these outside performers without seeming to to go against the Daoguang rule, the Shengping shu made these actors into court-appointed teachers, referred to as minji jiaoxi \Á Äy ±Ð ²ß, to instruct court singers by putting on performances as “demonstrations.”[30] Thus from 1883 onward, inviting individual singers became part of the system in the Qing court. From 1893, Cixi also was able to stretch the rules further by inviting entire troupes to come and perform. It was during these performances that she was exposed to, and became fond of, certain singers.

      The Shengping shu had been established in 1827 to replace the Nanfu «n ² .[31] It was under the control of the interior ministry. Other than to organize and manage opera performances in court, its responsibility was also to oversee opera troupes operating in society. This was done through the actors guild Jingzhong hui.[32] Although the office was theory in under the interior ministry, its chief (zongguan Á` ºÞ ) reported directly to the Emperor and received orders from him. According to court records for 1829, there were  four officials (shouling ­º »â ) and 2 eunuchs under the  bureau chief’s command. [33] The member of the court troupe managed by them were called internal students (neixue ¤º ¾Ç ) and consisted of eunuchs. With 69 performers and 34 back-stage personnel, the total came to 110 persons.[34] Their training and task was to be able to perform ritual singing as well as opera. The five-tiered monthly pay scale for the neixue ranged from three to four liang of silver plus 5.9 shi of rice at the upper end to two liang of silver with 2.2 shi of rice at the lower.[35]

      Between 1883 when the system of "Attendants of the inner court" (gongfeng neiting) was created until 1908 a total of 77 ‘outside’ actors were employed in this category.[36] This was a very special category as the actors were in part ‘court attendants’ and in part professional actors in commercial theaters. As a group they represented the finest achievement at a given time in Peking opera. Due to their special position, these actors operated as a liaison between society and the court, in the process they became transmitters of artistic taste and fashion between the two. Their duties in court were twofold; they were to perform when called upon, and they were to teach the inner court students. They received a monthly salary for the time they entered the service. They were paid in two ways; with a monthly fixed sum of two liang of silver, 10 ko of white rice plus one strand of qian; and with rewards given after each performance.[37] This second sum which depended of Cixi’s appreciation of their performance, in fact constituted their main income from their court performance. During Cixi's time, this second sum gradually increased to a considerable amount, going from 8 liang silver as the highest reward in 1883, to 60 liang for Tan Xinpei and Hou Junshan ­Ô «T ¤s  in 1908.[38]

      These "attendants of the inner court" and especially those favored by the Empress Dowager gained substantial prestige in the eyes of their colleagues and in society. An example is Chen Delin ³¯ ¼wªL whose career did not make much headway until he appeared in court. When after his first appearance he was praised by Cixi (even though only indirectly), he was swamped with invitations to perform.[39] 

      This was not a one-way road. Actors who had made their fame in society would find themselves invited to perform in the court. According to the theater historian Qi Rushan »ô ¦p ¤s, Peking theaters had a special box reserved for the Shengping shu official scouting for actors to invite. No doubt, the audience reaction to the performance would influence their choice.[40] When Tan Xinpei first started to offer his service to the Empress Dowager in 1890, he had long since made a name for himself. But his court appointment  no doubt helped him to raise his fees for commercial performances. In 1888, the daily income of Tan was already as high as 120 diao, by 1894, he received 30 liang of silver for performing two numbers at a private party.[41] Being an "Attendant of the inner court" was quite clearly a form of cultural capital that would translate into real money.[42]

      There is no doubt that Cixi's patronage of Peking opera singers was important in the development and prestige of Peking opera and it lead singers. But was it decisive in making the actors she had choosen into national stars? The transformation of basic policies of the Shengping shu in creating an "invitation based" system for actors to come to court and developing a system of substantial financial rewards given to the top actors and not a troupe, directly points to the impact of Shanghai. Judging, furthermore, from the year the actors entered into the service of the court and from the stage of their career they were at this moment, the impact of Shanghai is even clearer. Most of these actors had been to Shanghai; they had already made their name by performing in commercial theaters, and were will into their late 30s and early 40s. For example, when Sun Juxian first entered the court, he was already forty years old, Shi Xiaofu was thirty-eight, and Yang Yuelou also 40.[43]  With few exceptions, the actors patronized by Cixi were first “discovered” or honored by the Shanghai theater establishment and in one way or another had made their fame and name in the Foreign Settlements during the early part of their career. This is not to question the important role played by court patronage in the rise of  Peking opera to become the dominant performing art form. But we have to ask, as Shanghai became a competing center, in what way did it compete; and what alternatives did it offer to distinguish itself and to establish its prominence?

      In the competition for the greater impact on the making of stars and on shaping the star culture, Shanghai appears to win out on substantial points. First, in terms of time frame, the Shanghai market had first discovered and made into stars many of the later court favorites. We know this not only because they appeared in Shenbao (which did not automatically make them into stars, but at least dramatically enhanced their name recognition in the urban centers), but because when they returned from Shanghai to Peking, their standing had improved. This can be seen in the case of Yang Yuelou, for example, who when he first  returned to Peking, as we will see later in this paper, brought with him a certain leverage.

It would appear that it was Cixi who imitated the style set by Shanghai in inviting lead singer and not the troupe to court as as had been the custom in the past. In this court environment, however, actors had to work within strict guidelines; their acts being censored, the texts they were to use had to be first vetted and approved, and they were bound to strictly adhere to court etiquette and keep time restraints. With regard to the star system just evolving, the court furthermore maintained the procedure of the Peking theater troupes where lead singer were also required to play supporting roles. For the court performances, the concept of lead versus support roles did not exist. All actors were assigned to play different kinds of roles. The decision rested with the Shengping fu with the final approval being given by Cixi and the Guangxu Emperor.[44]

As the foreign concessions had far fewer restrictions they were relatively free to develop entertainment into a major attraction. As a consequence, such places such as Tianjin and Wuhan joined Shanghai to provide a new type of  public arena or open space that allowed actors to go on tour; once they had been invited to Shanghai, their itinerary  would normally be Peking -- Shanghai -- Wuhan --Tianjin and back. These tours allowed the emerging stars to meet their audience in person and not just on paper or in gossip. The modern star as a national phenomenon was very much the product of this movement between North and South. On that front, Qing court patronage was not able to compete.

Finally, appointment as court attendant came with a high price. While an actor would gain substantial financial advantages and social prestige by being singled out by Cixi, he still could be subjected to extremely humiliating treatment as the status of a singer in the court protocol was still not higher than that of a bond servant. This was not easy to take for people who began to regard themselves as stars. A case in point is the insult done to Tan Xinpei. Although he was one of Cixi’s most beloved actors, he was threatened with having his ears boxed on orders by Cixi during a performance because of a slight oversight in court etiquette. Tan never got over this, and the rancor about this profound humiliation never left him.[45] By comparison, he received the red carpet treatment of a super star during his many Shanghai engagements. The only thing harping on his nerves in Shanghai were the journalists and theater critics.[46] The combination of high financial rewards and of dignified treatment the singers received in Shanghai made the city an easy match to court patronage by the end of the nineteenth century when the cultural as well as political (and financial) standing of the Qing court also was in decline.

 

 

Shanghai’s impact on Peking

     

      According to most histories of the Peking opera, the star system, referred to as “Mingjiao zhi” ¦W¨¤¨î   or “Mingxing zhi” ú¬P¨î , began in Peking with Tan Xinpei, and, more precisely in 1896 with Tan going to court to sing for the Empress Dowager bringing for the first time renowned musicians selected by himself to accompany him.[47] Most scholars and studies claim that this was the moment when the traditional troupe system began to be replaced by a star system. As argued by these studies, the organization of a Peking opera troupe had previously been around a group of singers each with his own specialty, and there was no real  concept of a lead singer nor a special sequence in appearance that might suggest it. With Tan Xinpei choosing his own musicians, it is argued, the star system came into being. It brought about a shift from equality to hierarchy  with the troupe gradually being organized around a single star; and this was also reflected in the altered sequence of stage appearance with the lead singer marking himself apart from the others by playing the last acts, referred to as dazhouxi ¤j¶bÀ¸.[48] This line of argument goes on to state that with this star system a new form of financial arrangement emerged with the “baoyin zhi” \]»È¨î  being replaced by “xifen zhi”  -- À¸\÷¨î  the system of contracts for individual performances.[49]

      This line of argument completely disregards Shanghai's impact on Peking opera in terms of organizational arrangement. It is clear that the invitation to individual singers both in conceptual terms and in terms of business management breaks with the tradition of treating an actor as part of an opera troupe. As a result of this new business arrangement between theater and individual actor, a fundamental shift in financial relationships took place. Perhaps the most profound impact of Shanghai theater business practice on the formation of the star system was the introduction of a “free market  system” of financial arrangement. As we have seen, Peking had been operating on the baoyin system where financial arrangements between the actor and his troupe in Peking had been based on annual contracts clearly stipulating the scale of pay and the obligations of the actor. The system started to break down in the 1880s, and was gradually replaced be the so-called xifen system À¸\÷¨î -- payment per performance. The Shanghai factor can again be seen with Yang Yuelou. According to Qi Rushan, the xifen system was introduced to Peking by Yang Yuelou when he returned from Shanghai in the late 1870s: “In the past, the Peking theater troupe went according to the baoyin system; after an agreement had been reached, there would be no further changes;  whether the owner of the troupe makes or loses money has nothing to with the singer. During the early years of the Guangxu period (that is, during the later 1870s), Yang Yuelou returned to Peking from Shanghai, and joined the Sanqing troupe. His performance was extremely popular (jineng jiaozuo·\¯à\s®y), thus he made a arrangement with the owner and changed [his contract from baoyin zhi] to the system of having a share in dividends according to a preset percentage (fencheng ¤À¦¨).”[50] This in fact was a practice of Shanghai. When Sun Juxian first came to Shanghai in 1870, his arrangement with the theater owner was that of a fixed percentage of the daily take (referred to as chaichang î ±b ).[51]

      The ramifications of this new financial arrangement were significant. It gave the actor, and especially the lead singer, a greater independence and flexibility, and enhanced his interest in the attractiveness of the performance. In the old system, once an actor had signed his contract, he was under no circumstances allowed to join other troupes for  performances while his contract lasted. The new system effectively made the actor into a free agent able to perform with other troupes during the days not covered by the contract.[52] The subsequent increase in mobility was an important element in the rise of the star culture. The actor was now directly subjected to the forces at the market place, where he was treated as an individual and no longer as a member of a troupe even though there still was a strong organization supporting him. 

 

 

Advertisement and star image at the market place

     

The star system emerging in Shanghai had an indispensable component: the newspaper. To generate maximum attention for their show was part of an overall marketing strategy by the Shanghai theater owners. With theater news and theater criticism the newspapers played a crucial role in developing the concept of stardom and building the renown of individual stars. Theater advertisements were an important source of income for the papers, increased the usefulness of the papers of their readers, and allowed the theaters to reach a potential audience beyond the narrow circles of afficionadoes and the passers-by. 

This was an overwhelmingly new world for Mei Lanfang when he first came to Shanghai to perform and saw the mechanism of public opinion making in operation between the theater, the newspaper, and advertisement. From Peking he had no experience with either newspaper advertisement or the public advertisements known as haibao ®ü³ø for the theater. He was simply stunned by the prominence of advertisement   on the Shanghai streets and in the newspapers, and alarmed by their contents as far as he himself was concerned. He read about himself: “The one and only,  number one under Heaven soprano has been cordially invited to perform for the first time in Shanghai” or “The one and only soprano in the world”.[53]

      The presentations of the opera singer was clearly reflected in the style of newspaper and street advertisements which would feature one lead singer exclusively; thus for the same show and the same theater there would be several different kinds of advertisements for the different pieces. In this manner the public attention was focused on the lead singers and their names figured prominently. [Fig. 3] The big daily newspapers, furthermore, all carried the daily theater program, a routine started early by the Shenbao in 1872. The public projection of having a unique and exclusive show was part of the business strategy of the Shanghai theater owners; to have a ‘star’ on stage went well with this strategy and thus the theater owners had a vested interest in promoting to stardom the actors they had hired.

Another important component in promoting a cult of stars was the creation of the star image and personality, both pictorially and narratively. The Shanghai concession with its rapidly developing print industry opened a whole visual market based on this theme. In the unspoken competition between the Peking court and the Shanghai concession this element proved once more the strength of the concession.  News about the private life of the stars became a selling point for the newspapers and developed into a veritable sub-genre, reinforcing at the same time the notion of the uniqueness and titillating attractiveness of the star.[54] The papers also provided the stars with a public form in which to directly or indirectly defend themselves, as demonstrated in the Yang Yuelou case. In this way they broke with the age old tradition where the low social status of the opera singer necessarily meant seeking out patrons for protection as the only recourse against possible injustice.

      As to crafting the pictorial image of the star, which is very much part of modern star culture, there had been paintings of opera stars by court painters during the late nineteenth century, such as Chen Rongpu’s ¨H®e®E painting of the performance of Qunyinghui ¸s­^·| featuring the leading opera singers of the time Chen Changgen ³¯ªø°, Lu Shengkui ¿c³Ó«¶, and Xu Xiaoxiang  ®}¤p­», as well his famous painting “The thirteen ‘unparalleled’of the Tongzhi and Guangxu guang periods” (¦P\ú¤Q¤Tµ´). As these works were paintings mostly held by the court, their influence was very limited.[55]

      During the Qing period, theater illustrations were very much part of popular printing making. The theater market in Peking was not unaware of  the importance of pictorial representation in stimulating business. In his study of popular prints, Wang Shucun ¤ý¾ð§ø points out that pictorial representation of actors had in fact a long history. By the Qing period and with the Qianlong Emperor’s patronage of Peking opera, popular prints on theater developed into a major genre. Portraits of leading Peking opera singers began to appear in art shops (they could even have been commissioned by the opera troupes or theater owners).[56] According the nineteenth century Peking city guide Dumen jilüe ³£ªù¬ö²¤ (The essential guide to the capital) by Yang Jingting ·¨ÀR«F, during the Jiaqing period the art gallery Chenyizhai ¸Û¤@ÂN had a painting by He Shikui ¶P\@«¶ with “The thirteen ‘unparalleled’”¤Q¤Tµ´.[57] In later popular theater prints produced by the Yangliuqing ·¨¬h«C  we also find, although very rarely, examples where the name of the actor appeared beside the image. The main emphasis of the popular prints was not, however, on the individual singer, but on particular opera scenes. [58] While these prints were atypical although certainly important ingredients of the early star cult, their impact remained local and their influence on shaping the image of the star and star culture limited.

      By contrast, the Shanghai media with the new technologies such as lithography and photography played the major role in popularizing the image of the star on a national scale. The Shanghai courtesans had been first on the road to stardom from the 1880s onward; opera singers imitated them and many of the ingredients of the star cult established around the top courtesans. The main medium was the press, and in particular the entertainment newspaper known in general as the xiaobao  ¤p³ø. Illustration and photography of opera stars eventually became one of the main features of these publications since the early 1910s. Through nation-wide distribution networks, these publications established the opera star firmly in the consciousness of public. Some photographs even ended up as collectors items in the Peking court. [Fig. 4]

 

Conclusion

     

Since its beginning, the theater establishment in the Shanghai Foreign Settlements used all the leeway offered there to upgrade its competition with Peking, and the Peking court in particular. On the surface, Peking opera in Shanghai did look like an import product from the north. But once we look at the particulars, it quickly becomes clear that the entire setup here was quite different. The Shanghai theater ran on very different operation principles and even assumptions than its Peking counterpart. These included theater organization, the system of  financial rewards, and the role played by the media. The fact that Peking was the place where Peking opera had evolved and become a mature art form with the help of patronage from the court also meant that it incorporated certain entrenched structures both ideologically and socially. By contrast, the stage in the Foreign Settlements in Shanghai had the advantage of being freer from traditional constraints, and thus potentially more experimental and innovative in its approach. Boxed into the lowest rank of the feudal social hierarchy, the chances of an opera singer to become a national star were low in Peking. In Shanghai, however, were things were driven by the market and there was less interference from gentry guardians of morals, the opera singer became a highly profitable commodity the potential of which was quickly recognized by the market. Circumventing Peking, the star was created here irrespective of the sanction of the court. In the end it was not the Qing court nor the patronage by the Empress Dowager but the Shanghai Concession which laid the foundation for the star culture. Thus the star and star culture took form not on “center stage” in Peking at the court, but in what the court still regarded as a little corner by the sea, in the newly rising Shanghai concession with its powers of market and press

 

 

Illustrations:

 

[Fig. 1] Location of different troupes during the 19th century, Chuntai ban ¬K \x ¯Z  at Baishun hutong ¦Ê ¶¶ ­J ¦P , Sanqing ban ¤T ¼y ¯Z  at Hanjia tan Áú ®a ¼æ , Sixi ban \| ³ß ¯Z  at Shanxi gong °¢ ¦è «Ñ , Chunhe ban  M ¬K ¯Z at  §õ ÅK ä ±× µó ,  ±] ¯¬ ¦¨   ¯Z  at \Û ÀY ­J ¦P ]; and different theaters, in Qing period Map.

 

[Fig. 2] Wu Youru §d ¤Í ¦p , "Huaren xiyuan" µØ ¤H À¸ ¶é (Chinese theater) from \Ó ¦¿ ³Ó ´º ¹Ï , Shanghai: Shenbaoguan, 1884, with the inscription on one of the poles of the stage "\» ¶é ¯S ½Ð ¨Ê ³£ ÀY µ\ «È ¦ê ·¨ ¤ë ¼Ó ­ã ¤_ §Y ¤é ¶} ºt

 



[1] The term kechuan has two meanings. It can stand for a non-professional temporarily joining a troupe and performing on stage; the second meaning is that of an outside actor performing with a troupe as a guest.

[2] During the 18th century a part of the laws restricting entertainers was lifted, but in pratice the same prejudices persisted; for details see Anders  Hansson, Chinese Outcasts: Discrimination and Emancipation in Late Imperial China. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1996, p.42; pp. 163-4.

[3] For the Yang Yuelou case see Ye Xiaoqing, “Unacceptable Marriage and the Qing Legal Code: The Case of Yang Yuelou,” Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia, 27-28 (1995/6): 195-212. Goodman, Bryna, Native Place, City, and Nation : Regional Networks and Identities in Shanghai, 1853-1937,

 Berkeley: Univ. of California Pr., 1995, pp. 111-117.

[4] For a discussion on the Yang Yuelou case in the newspaper, see Natasha Vittinghoff xxx, Rudolf Wagner, "Ernest Major’s Shenbaoguan and the Formation of Late Qing Print culture," paper prepared for the Conference The Formation of a Multiethnic Urban Culture: The Shanghai Concessions 1850-1910, Heidelberg 1998.

[5] Min Ai \Á «s , "Nanbei liyuan lueshi"  «n \_ ±ù ¶é \v ²¤  (The essential history of theater North and South) in Zhou Jianyun P ¼C ¶³  ed., Jubu congkan µâ ³¡ ÂO \Z   (1918). Rept. Minguo congshu 2:69;  vol. 1, section wutai xinshi, pp. 2-4.

[6] Tino Balio, Grand Design: Hollywood as a Modern Business Enterprise, 1930-1939. Berkeley, Univ. of California Press, 1993.

[7] Beijingshi yishu yanjiusuo \_¨Ê\«ÃÀ³N¬ã¨sÒ. Shanghai yishu yanjiusuo ¤W®üÃÀ³N¬ã¨sÒ, eds. Zhongguo jingju shi ¤¤°ê¨Ê¼@\v (The history of Chinese opera). Beijing: Zhongguo xiju chubanshe, 1990, p. 47.

[8] Li Chang §õ ºZ , Qingdai yilai de Beijing juchang ²M \N \H ¨Ó ªº \_ ¨Ê ¼@ ³õ  (Theaters in Beijing from the Qing period onwards). Beijing: Beijing Yanshan chubanshe, 1998, p. 86; Zhongguo jingju shi, p.101.    

[9] Qi Rushan »ô ¦p ¤s , Jinju zhi bianqian ¨Ê ¼@ ªº ÅÜ ¾E  (The changes in Peking opera). Beijing, 1935; rept. Rept. Minguo congshu 2:69, p. 95.

[10] Zhongguo jingju shi, p. 150.

[11] [Zhou] Jianyun P ¼C ¶³, "Ping baoyin yi"  \­ \] »È ij   (On a just sum for [intivation fee] daoyin) in  Juban congkan, vol. 1, section Juxue luntan p.17

[12] Yang Jingting ·¨ÀR«F, Dumen jilüe ³£ªù¬ö²¤ (A Record of Essential Aspects of the Capital City). Beijing: Jingdu tang, 1845; see Zhongguo jingju shi (The history of Chinese Peking opera), pp. 100-102.

[13] Zhongguo jingju shi, pp. 101-2.

[14] Ye Tao ¸­ÀÜ, Zhongguo jingju xisu ¤¤°ê¨Ê¼@²ß«U (The customs of Chinese Peking opera). Xian: Shanxi renmin chubanshe, 1994, pp. 117-8.

[15] Zhang Guyu ±i \j ·M , "Shanghai juchang bianqian jiyao" ¤W ®ü ¼@ ³õ ÅÜ ¾E ¬ö ­n  (An outline of the changes in the development of Shanghai theater) in Shanghai xiju shiliao huicui 1986, No. 1, p. 89

[16] Min Ai \Á«s, “Nanbei liyuan lueshi” (A short history of theater North and South) «n\_±ù¶é²¤\v in Zhou Jianyun ed., Jubu congkan (1918) 1:3; “Bailinlai Shanghai liyuan de yange” in Shanghaishi daguan, 1947, Vol. 2, pp.44-45; Xiang Yuezhi ºµ ¤ë ¤§ ed., Shanghai tongshi (A complete history of Shanghai) ¤W ®ü ³q \v . Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1999, Vol.6, pp.424-427.

[17] Min Ai, “Nanbei liyuan lueshi” (A short history of theater North and South) pp.3-4; Xue Liyong Á§ ²z  «i , Shanghaitan diming zhanggu ¤W ®ü Åy ¦a ¦W ´x ¬G . Shanghai: Tongji daxue chubanshe, 1996, pp.172-174.

[18] Min Ai, “Nanbei liyuan lueshi” (A short history of theater North and South) pp.3-4; Zhang Guyu ±i \j ·M , "Shanghai juchang bianqian jiyao" ¤W ®ü ¼@ ³õ ÅÜ ¾E ¬ö ­n  (An outline of the changes in the development of Shanghai theater), p. 89.

[19] Chen Boxi ³¯ §B º³ , "Yang Yuelou an" ´­ ¤ë ¼Ó ®×  (The case of Yang Yuelou) Shanghai yishi daguan ¤W ®ü ¶c ¨Æ ¤j Æ[  (An encyclopedia of past events in Shanghai). 1919; rept. Shanghai: Shanghai shudian, 2000, p. 471.

[20] [Zhou] Jianyun, "Ping baoyin yi"  \­ \] »È ij   (On a just sum for [intivation fee] daoyin) in  Jubu congkan, vol. 1, section Juxue luntan, p. 17.

[21] Lo Liangsheng ù «G \Í , "Tan Xinpei liuci dao Shanghai" ÃÓ øÊ °ö ¤» ¦¸ ¨ì  ¤W ®ü   (Tan Xinpei's six visits to Shanghai) in Shanghai xiju shiliao huicui 1986, No. 3, pp. 62-67.

[22]  [Zhou] Jianyun, "Ping baoyin yi"  \­ \] »È ij   (On a just sum for [intivation fee] daoyin) in  Jubu congkan, vol. 1, section Juxue luntan p. 17.

[23] Mei Lanfang, ±öÄõªÚ, Wutai shenghuo sishi nian »R\x\ͬ¡\|¤Q¦~ (Forty years of life on the stage). Beijing: Zhongguo xiju chubanshe, 1961, vol. 1, p.123.  Li told Mei later that the initial offer to Mei was only $1,400 until Li intervened to have it raised to $1,800. The contract was for one month , later to be extended to 45 days; see Mei Lanfang, vol. 1, p.123, p.146, p.181. For a study on the rise of Mei Lanfang as star see Catherine V. Yeh, "From Male 'Flower' to National Star: Choreographing Mei Lanfang's Rise to Stardom" in press.

[24] Shanghai zujie zhi bianji weiyuanhui,¤W ®ü ¯² ¬É §Ó ½s ¿è e ­û ·| ed. Shanghai zujie zhi (Chronicle of the Shanghai foreign concession [s]) ¤W ®ü ¯² ¬É §Ó . Shanghai: Shanghai shehui kexueyuan chubanshe, 2001, p. 326, p. 329.

[25] There is an earlier term, chuanke ¦ê «È. As far as we know, this was solely used for non-professionals joining a professional troupe for a performance. In this sense it is being used in the eighteenth century, see, for example,  Li Dou §õ¤æ, Yangzhou huafang lu ´­¦{µe¯é¿ý (A record of the painted boats at Yangzhou). Repr. Jiangsu: Jiangsu guanglin guji keyinshe, 1984, p. 117, p. 121.

[26] It continued to be used in referring to visiting actors from Peking well into the Republic period.

Min Ai, “Nanbei liyuan lueshi” (A short history of theater North and Sourth) pp.3-4.

[27] Mo Shuyi ¤ ®Ñ »ö , "Wan Qing gongting xiju kaoshu" ±ß ²M ®c §Ê À¸ ¼@ ¦Ò ­z (A study on Opera in the late Qing court), Paper given  at the Conference on "From the Late Ming to the Late Qing: Historical Dynamics and Cultural Innovations", Peking University, Aug. 10-12, 2000, p. 10.

[28] Cixi's own troupe Putian tongqing ´¶ ¤Ñ ¦P ¼y  with 180 members under the leadership of the head eunuch Li Lianying §õ ½¬ ­^  performed some time after 1883; see Mo Shuyi, p. 12.

[29] On the reform of court theater by the Daoguang Emperor see Colin Mackerras, The Rise of the Peking Opera, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972, p. 120-121.

[30] Ye Tao, p.147.

[31] The office in charge of court entertainment was first known as Nanfu during the Qing, in 1827 (Daoguang 7) its name was changed to Shengping shu; see Wang Zhizhang ¤ý ªé ³¹ , Qing Shengping shu zhilue ²M ª@ \­ ¸p §Ó ²¤  (The essential record on the Shengping office of the Qing court). Shanghai: Shangwu yishuguan, 1937, pp. 5-40. See also Colin Mackerras, The Rise of the Peking Opera, pp. 154-156.

[32] Zhongguo Jingju shi, p.210, p.221.

[33] Wang Zhizhang, pp. 51-54.

[34] Shengping shu rendeng huaming tang ª@ \­ ¸p ¤H µ\ ªá ¦W ÀÉ   (Archive of number and rankings of personel in the Shengping office), see Mo Shuyi, pp. 4-5.

[35] Ibid., pp. 53-54.

[36] The breakdown is as follows: 1883 -- 20 persons, 1884 -- 1 person, 1886 -- 6 persons, 1888 -- 2 persons, 1890 -- 4 persons, 1891 -- 3 persons, 1892 -- 4 persons, 1895 --6 persons, 1900 --3 persons, 1902 --6 persons, 1904 --14 persons, 1906 --1 person, 1907 --6 persons, and 1908 --1 person; see Wang Zhizhang, vol. 2, pp. 556-580.

[37] Zhou Mingtai P ú ®õ , Qing Shengping shu cundang shili manshao ²M ª@ \­ ¸p ¦s ÀÉ ¨Æ ¨Ò º §Û   (Selected materials from the archive of the Shengping office of the Qing [dynasty]), Tianjin: Dalu shuju, 1933, reprint Taipei: Wenhai chubanshi, 1971, pp. Vol. 3, pp. 81-95.

[38] Xu Moyun , Liyuan yingshi (Theater events of the past), Shanghai: Huadong yinshua gongsi, 1933, p. 225; see also Mo Shuyi, p. 14.

[39] Qi Rushan, Qi Rushan quanji, Vol.4, pp.2208-2209.

[40] Qi Rushan, "Xijie xiao zhanggu" À¸ ¬É ¤p ´x ¬G  (Stories of the theater world) in Jinju tanwang lu, Beijing: Beijing chubanshe, 1996, p. 458.

[41] Chen Yianheng ³¯ «Û ¿Å , "Jiuju congtan"  ¼@ ÂO ½Í  () in Qingdai liyuan shiliao, Vol. 2, p. 860.

[42] Until the Late Qing period rewards given to actors in court were material objects with symbolic rather than financial value, see Mo Shuyi, p. 13.

[43] Zhou Mingtai, Vol. 1, pp. 81-83.

[44] Ye Tao, p. 148.

[45] Qi Rushan, xxx

[46] Zhou Jianyun P ¼C ¶³ , "Tan Xinpei nanlai Hushang yanchu zhi huisu" (Looking back on Tan xingpei's visit to Shanghai) ÃÓ øÊ °ö «n ¨Ó º­ ¤W ºt \X ¤§ ¦^ ·¹ in Dai Shujuan À¹ ²Q ®S  eds., Tan Xinpei yishu pinglun ji (A collection of criticism on Tan Xinpei's [performing] art) ÃÓ øÊ °ö ÃÀ ³N µû ½× ¶° . Beijing: Zhongguo xiqu chubanshe, 1990, pp. 139-40.

[47] Zhongguo jingju shi (The history of Chinese Peking opera), pp.148-149.

[48] Ibid., p. 149.

[49] Ibid., p. 148.

[50] Qi Rushan, “Jingqu de bianqian” ¨Ê¼@ªºÅܾE p. 95.

[51] [Zhou] Jianyun, "Ping baoyin yi", p. 17.

[52] Qi Rushan, “Jingqu de bianqian,”  p.17.

[53] Mei Lanfang, vol. 1, p.141.

[54] See Catherine Yeh, "Courtesan stars and entertainment newspapers" in her City, Courtesan and Intellectual: The Rise of Entertainment Culture in Shanghai 1850-1910. In press.

[55] They are held in court in the Shengping shu, see Wang Shucun ¤ý ¾ð §ø , Xiju nianhua (Theater New years painting)  À¸ ¼@ ¦~ µe . Taipei: Hansheng chuban youxian gongsi, 1990, vol.1, p.17.

[56] Wang Shucun, Xiju nianhua, vol.1, p.16.

[57]  Ibid., vol. 1, p. 16.

[58] Ibid., vol.1, p.25.